Many who are familiar with the John Titor posts will recognize a key phrase at the end of this article by Paul Watson: “Waco-style” events.
In 2000, John Titor, a man claiming to be a time traveler (and proven to be an actual time traveler in Conviction of a Time Traveler) said the following:
I would describe [the civil war] as having a Waco type event every month that steadily gets worse. The conflict will consume everyone in the US by 2012 and end in 2015 with a very short WWIII.
I have just been informed by a former senior military leader that Obama is using a new “litmus test” in determining who will stay and who must go in his military leaders. Get ready to explode folks. “The new litmus test of leadership in the military is if they will fire on US citizens or not.” Those who will not are being removed.
January 22, 2013
|Retired Admiral James Lyons|
Some have asked me, how did I predict the true events/causes of that fateful day of September 11, 2012? Did John Titor somehow intimate what was to happen? Are you clairvoyant? Did you Remote View it? The answers to all these questions are “no.”
What allowed me to see clearly the true and actual reasons for the debacle in Benghazi was my unvarnished understanding of the people who are ruling (not governing) this country at the moment and the prism through which they view the world.
So, it should come as no surprise that there are others who also saw what I perceived in the days following Sep 11, 2012, and have the courage to actually voice these thoughts.
The below article is now only one of many on the internet. Of course, one must wonder: Why aren’t any of the mainstream media outlets covering this? For those who love and/or hate the Fox News Channel, how do you explain their silence on this? CNN and MSNBC’s silence is easily explained. So, if you hate Fox, how do you explain how they are not covering this considering it is more ammunition for Obama’s political enemies? Or, conversely, if you love Fox news, how do you explain their silence?
It is my sincere hope that many out there will begin to see that the editorial choices of the mainstream media are not in your/our best interest and has no bearing on informing their viewership. Next time you see another puff piece on CNN, MSNBC, ABC or Fox about who won the Golden Globes or whichever movie star is dating whichever other movie star, ask yourself why they are spending precious airtime on that instead of the purposeful murder by inaction of an American Ambassador.
January 11, 2013 By
It’s even worse than we previously thought. A retired four-star admiral is now claiming that Barack Obama intentionally conspired with America’s enemies to stage a bogus attack and the kidnapping of an American ambassador so he could “negotiate” the release of a “hostage” and bolster his mediocre approval ratings just prior to the election!
But something went horribly wrong with Obama’s “October Surprise.” Although the Obama Administration intentionally gutted security at the consulate prior to the staged kidnapping, former Navy SEALs Tyrone Woods and Glen Doherty disobeyed direct orders to stand down, saved American lives, single-handedly killed scores of attackers…and the attackers, believing that Obama had betrayed them, tortured Ambassador Chris Stevens and dragged his body through the streets.
Some will say that Admiral Lyons’ accusation is not a smoking gun. We agree; that’s exactly why Congress must investigate Benghazi-gate.
Moreover, we firmly believe the problem with Admiral Lyons’ assertion is that he is only scratching the surface; the full and complete truth may be much, much worse.
Benghazi-gate is not about a bogus YouTube video series of lies. It’s not about the Obama Administration’s foreign policy ineptitude. We are dealing with something much more sinister… something potentially treasonous… and the following questions, posed in an article in The New American, go to the heart of the matter:
- ”What was the Obama administration’s full role in helping violent Jihadists, self-styled al Qaeda terrorists, and Western-backed “revolutionaries” take over Libya in the first place?
- Did that half-baked scheme to arm Jihadist leaders, who… had previously fought U.S. troops in Iraq, contribute to the attack, as countless experts and officials have suggested?
- What was actually going on at the compound in Benghazi, which, as the report states, was never a “consulate” despite establishment media claims?
- Was Ambassador Stevens recruiting and arming Jihadists and terrorists to wage war on the Syrian regime after what Obama called the “success” in Libya, as a growing body of credible evidence suggests?
- Why did the administration claim for so long that the attack was just a “protest” over a YouTube video gone awry, even when it knew definitively that was not the case?
- Was the lack of security at the compound a political ploy to conceal the extent of the lawlessness and utter chaos left in the wake of Obama’s unconstitutional “regime change” war on Libya, as even members of Congress have alleged?”
It’s clear. Benghazi-Gate is only a small piece of a much larger operation, an attempt to conceal what The New American calls “the Obama administration’s full role in helping violent Jihadists and self-styled al Qaeda terrorists.”
Prior to the election Barack Obama continually told us that “Osama bin-Laden is dead and GM is alive”; but the sad truth is that Osama bin-Laden’s organization is alive and well, and the Obama Regime may be giving aid and comfort to this terrorist network.
And prior to the election, Fox News’ Geraldo Rivera pontificated that Republicans shouldn’t “politicize” Benghazi-gate. Swaggering onto the set of Fox and Friends, Rivera bloviated: “I think we have to stop this politicizing.” And Rivera issued the following veiled warning to Republicans: “Do we want to try and influence the election with a tragedy that happened in North Africa?”
Ironic, isn’t it? Barack Obama played politics with the lives of Americans; like Rivera, the media covered Obama’s rear and threatened to accuse anyone and everyone who mentioned it of “playing politics.”
Weak-willed Republicans apparently took Rivera’s threat to heart as Rivera also said that Republican Senators John Barrasso, James Inhofe, and Bob Corker, who all sit on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, “all agree that the supercharged atmosphere around the story — prudence dictates that these hearings be postponed until” after the election.
Well, the election has come and gone. Congress now has no excuse. The American people needed the truth before the election; but now that Obama is back in the White House, real conservatives must demand answers.
The American people deserve to have those questions answered; and moreover, the American people deserve justice.
h/t Katie Pavlich
Read her article here